| From: Sam Tobin-Hochstadt (samth at ccs.neu.edu) Date: Mon Oct 10 09:44:59 EDT 2011 |
|
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Shriram Krishnamurthi <sk at cs.brown.edu> wrote: > Wait, now I realize I misunderstood Sam's proposal. Doesn't this just > make all structs into lists? Like back to the bad old days of 1995? No, that was just an example of how to define the `make-foo', `foo-x', etc functions. More sensible definitions should work too. The runtime meaning of the functions should be irrelevant. -- sam th samth at ccs.neu.edu
| Posted on the dev mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}