From: Shriram Krishnamurthi (sk at cs.brown.edu) Date: Fri May 20 19:46:20 EDT 2011 |
|
> I see no reason to change `letrec'. Fixing internal definitions is the > goal; I didn't see (until Robby's suggestion) that fixing internal > definitions doesn't necessarily require a change to `letrec'. This will also have the salutary effect of encouraging the use of internal definitions, which I think is a nicer programming style anyway! Shriram
Posted on the dev mailing list. |
|