[racket-dev] added function to srfi-19....

15 minutes ago, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I think it's a bad idea to extend the SRFI modules with new functions.
> 
> Would it make sense to move functionality from SRFI-19 into
> `racket/date' and then add the new functions there (and maybe change
> the SRFI-19 implementation to re-export part of `racket/date')?

+1, if possible -- maybe it will also solve the license issues with
that file?

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!