[racket-dev] `take' argument order

From: Vincent St-Amour (stamourv at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Wed Jun 8 12:19:53 EDT 2011

At Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:15:58 -0500,
Robby Findler wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
> > In any case, I do take compatibility as a priority, so I'm suggesting
> > allowing both orders for this case.
> I did not mention this (remaining silent in response to your comment
> with the word 'flame' in the original message), but I am strongly
> against this choice.


Allowing both orders sounds like it would lead to a lot of confusion
and make code harder to read.


Posted on the dev mailing list.