[racket-dev] `take-until' etc

Me too.  I like `take-until' as well.

2011/6/8 Jay McCarthy <jay.mccarthy at gmail.com>:
> I'd really like #:unless as well
>
> iPhoneから送信
>
> On 2011/06/08, at 9:21, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
>
>> Anyone seconds this?
>>
>> And if so, then maybe for-loops should have an `#:unless' too?  (I
>> know that this was raised, but now there's more experience using it.)
>>
>>
>>
>> Yesterday, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>>> I've used them before and I find they "read" better than using negate.
>>>
>>> 2011/6/7 Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org>:
>>>> Does anyone see a need for `take-until' (and `drop-' and `-right'
>>>> versions), or is `negate' enough to not have that?
>>
>> --
>>          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
>>                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
>



-- 
sam th
samth at ccs.neu.edu