[racket-dev] `take' argument order

From: Robby Findler (robby at eecs.northwestern.edu)
Date: Wed Jun 8 11:15:58 EDT 2011

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
> In any case, I do take compatibility as a priority, so I'm suggesting
> allowing both orders for this case.

I did not mention this (remaining silent in response to your comment
with the word 'flame' in the original message), but I am strongly
against this choice.

Robby


Posted on the dev mailing list.