[racket-dev] `regexp-match**'

50 minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> Why does regexp-match** need to take this extra argument?  Can't we
> just use map like normal?

I can't parse this.


> If we want users to process each match in turn, possibly to allow
> early garbage collection, it sounds like an in-regexp-matches
> sequence would be better.

There might be a place for `in-regexp-whatever's, but that's
irrelevant to adding the function I'm talking about.

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!