[racket-dev] New error messages for *SL

I'd much prefer eliminating such function calls. 



On Jul 11, 2011, at 6:28 PM, Guillaume Marceau wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> wrote:
>> * ASL incorrectly specifies >= 1 arguments required for functions and
>>   function calls (i.e., functions and call are not common syntax at
>>   that point).
>> 
> 
> Stephen pointed out that function calls in BSL can invoke functions of
> zero arguments. You can't define such a function, but if you get it
> from a library, it works fine.
> 
> Should I document the grammar for function calls as (name expression
> ...) thorough?
> 
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev