| From: Robby Findler (robby at eecs.northwestern.edu) Date: Sat Jan 15 12:15:49 EST 2011 |
|
This means you think that re-providing should act like a provide/contract with the any/c contract (as it is currently (attempting) to do)? Robby On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Matthias Felleisen <matthias at ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > > I think the bottom line is that we should stick to the explicit notion of re-exporting and this 'feels' right given the general eq? problem.
| Posted on the dev mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}