[racket-dev] Can't use (current-output-port) with subprocess in DrRacket: does it matter?

On Jan 7, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Robby Findler wrote:

> I don't think it is possible with our current port support to make a
> port that goes into a text% and returns #t to that predicate (is it?).

In that case, I'll edit the docs to reflect this.

John

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4669 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20110107/6362cb6c/attachment.p7s>