[racket-dev] [plt] Push #22159: master branch updated

Yes, that does seem much better.



On Feb 11, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Robby Findler  
<robby at eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu>  
> wrote:
>> At Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:20:51 -0500, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>>> So instead of changing the 510 back to 400, I think that I'll remove
>>> it completely, and make the packing code not include any version
>>> requirements at all, and make the unpacking code not check any  
>>> version
>>> requirements from older versions.
>>>
>>> Matthew: does this sound reasonable?
>>
>> It's difficult to tell, but that sounds plausible.
>
> This sounds like a bad idea for 5.1
>
> If this is what we believe the right thing is, then I think that you
> should go back to 410 for the 5.1 release and look into removing it
> for 5.2.
>
> Robby
>