[racket-dev] syntax-property guards? (was: Re: The Stepper strikes again)

On Aug 13, 2011, at 11:33 AM, Robby Findler wrote:

> FWIW, there is precedent for this kind of thing, namely the properties
> that get added to syntax objects to tell check syntax about bindings
> that aren't in the fully expanded program (and yeah, I know there is a
> pending question about this; sorry I haven't had time to look into it
> and straighten things out).
> 
> Syntax properties generally seem like a good vehicle for
> languages/macros to communicate information to tools.

Totally, agree, natch.

John

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4624 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20110813/2b554175/attachment.p7s>