| From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu) Date: Wed Apr 27 16:02:15 EDT 2011 |
|
At Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:43:57 -0400, Vincent St-Amour wrote: > we're losing pretty hard on deriv. It looks like 20% of the time can be saved by JIT-inlining the `procedure-arity-includes?' check that `map' performs. (And I've been meaning to make that JIT change anyway, since it's an obstacle to using `map' in futures.) I'll push a change soon.
| Posted on the dev mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}