[racket-dev] Memory consumption of Racket
BLOCK_CACHE IS enabled by default in 5.1.1.3.
#define MZ_USE_PLACES (the default as of 5.1.1.3) enables block cache
(see top of gc2/vm.c file).
If you have a pre 5.1.1 version or have places disabled, then my block
cache patch won't be of any help.
Kevin
On 04/23/2011 01:09 AM, Nevo wrote:
> hi Kevin:
> Your patch seems requiring "USE_BLOCK_CACHE" to be enabled. Sorry
> for my lack of knowledge into Racket's memory management component,
> how can I safely enable that because I cannot find its reference in
> configure or Makefile.in? Thanks!
>
> Nevo
>
> On 23 April 2011 14:27, Nevo <sakur.deagod at gmail.com
> <mailto:sakur.deagod at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> hi Robby
> Just back from out of town, sorry for the late reply.
> No. This doesn't help at all, still got low-memory killing on my
> ipad. Actually, my own test is all based on "#lang racket/base".
> I'll try Kevin's patch to see any difference. I've also tried to
> throttle the max_pages_in_heap to allow around 25MB pages to use,
> it will soon throw "out of memory" exception and abort after a
> couple of GC cycles.
>
> Nevo
>
>
> On 22 April 2011 19:08, Robby Findler <robby at eecs.northwestern.edu
> <mailto:robby at eecs.northwestern.edu>> wrote:
>
> This program:
>
> #lang racket/base
> (printf "hi\n")
>
> uses a lot less memory than this one:
>
> #lang racket
> (printf "hi\n")
>
> Does that help at all?
>
> Robby
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Nevo <sakur.deagod at gmail.com
> <mailto:sakur.deagod at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > hi
> > My attempt on porting Racket interpreter to iOS has been
> for a while and
> > I've been able to run interpreter on both iOS device as well
> iOS simulator.
> > Right now, it runs perfectly on iOS simulator, but lack of
> satisfaction on
> > device. The reason is for those devices like iPad/iPhone or
> Android, the
> > memory for standalone application is always constrained, and
> even a single
> > "hello world" evaluation would easily put the whole app
> runtime to death,
> > per my test. In particular, here I've got some commented out
> "printf" code
> > compiled in for newgc.c, and trying to load a simple "hello
> world" racket
> > file to evaluate results in more than 30MB memory in use
> (reported by gc).
> > This is nothing for a desktop, but will kill itself easily
> in iOS which
> > usually requires the average memory allocation will be less
> than 20MB. So
> > I'm asking if there's some known compiling or runtime
> configuration which I
> > may not know to reduce memory usage, at least keep average
> allocation
> > acceptable for those memory constrained devices. Thanks for
> your suggests
> > here!
> > Nevo
> > _________________________________________________
> > For list-related administrative tasks:
> > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20110423/6d93f1c2/attachment-0001.html>