From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu) Date: Mon Oct 25 12:50:37 EDT 2010 |
|
At Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:31:43 -0600, Doug Williams wrote: > Matthew, would it make more sense to have unsafe-vector-ref (and related > functions) be the more general function and unsafe-vector*-ref be the one > that doesn't work on chaperoned vectors? That is just swap the definitions. > That way user code that is already using unsafe-vector-ref (etc) will > continue to work. Ok, let's swap them --- even for 5.0.2.
Posted on the dev mailing list. |
|