[racket-dev] How about adding this simple list-shuffling procedure to racket?

10 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
> I think we want the one recommended by the statisticians. :)

+1, not only because it's more robust, but there's the obvious benefit
of adding a one-liner.



> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Jay McCarthy <jay.mccarthy at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think we should put in a list shuffler into the core.
> >
> > Which should we use? The faster one?

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!