[racket-dev] [plt] Push #21393: master branch updated

Right, I wanted this experiment to be available to the next person who
wonders whether `apply-reduction-relation*' should use a trie. A
comment at the relevant place in the code points to the removed
commit:

http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/blobdiff/152084d5ce6ef49df3ec25c18e40069950146041..f9b64fa2b894ceb0795e4865b6b5f938e9738e81:/collects/redex/private/reduction-semantics.rkt

On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Jay McCarthy <jay.mccarthy at gmail.com> wrote:
> I believe Casey actually wants this code in the history.
>
> Jay
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 31, 2010, at 9:16 PM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
>
>> Four minutes ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 6:32 PM,  <clklein at racket-lang.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 152084d Casey Klein <clklein at racket-lang.org> 2010-10-31 17:13
>>>> :
>>>> | Adds an experiment in using a trie in `apply-reduction-relation*'
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>
>>>> f9b64fa Casey Klein <clklein at racket-lang.org> 2010-10-31 17:28
>>>> :
>>>> | Removes `apply-reduction-relation*' trie experiment
>>>
>>> You should learn about 'git rebase -i', with which you can drop
>>> commits entirely.
>>
>> Actually, in this case a more convenient tool is `git commit --amend'
>> which is a way to commit "more stuff" with the previous commit.
>>
>> --
>>          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
>>                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!
>> _________________________________________________
>>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
>