| From: Sam Tobin-Hochstadt (samth at ccs.neu.edu) Date: Wed May 26 16:07:57 EDT 2010 |
|
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote: > On May 25, David Van Horn wrote: >> Could the following make its way into unstable/list? It adds remf >> for symmetry with findf and memf. > > Is there any reason for putting it in unstable? It should not be used > outside of the racket tree. I agree - I can't imagine that the interface to `remf' is likely to change. -- sam th samth at ccs.neu.edu
| Posted on the dev mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}