From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu) Date: Mon Mar 29 16:43:35 EDT 2010 |
|
On Mar 29, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > For now, I'm opposed to either change. A mis-user of a syntactic form > shouldn't need to know that the form is implemented with `syntax-case' > or even with pattern matching. Eugene Kohlbecker would whole-heartedly agree here. Let's not confuse how a macro is implemented with what it supposed to do.
Posted on the dev mailing list. |
|