[plt-dev] Re: [plt-scheme] match for Promise

[changed to plt-dev]

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Jay McCarthy <jay.mccarthy at gmail.com> wrote:
>> [It seems to me define-coercion-match-expander is useful enough to belong in scheme/match.]
>
> I'm cool with that if others and Sam are. I'm also not super attached
> to the name, but it is what I thought of at the time.

I totally agree - it seems very useful.  If someone comes up with a
better name, I'll use it, otherwise I'll just add it with the current
name.

-- 
sam th
samth at ccs.neu.edu