[racket-dev] Fwd: [shootout-Feature Requests][312552] Scheme PLT should be renamed to Racket

I submitted a request to the computer language shootout to rename PLT
to Racket.  The following message shows the difference in performance
between 4.2.5 and 5.0 - it's probably worth taking a look at the
discrepancies.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:  <shootout-featurerequests at alioth.debian.org>
Date: Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:19 PM
Subject: [shootout-Feature Requests][312552] Scheme PLT should be
renamed to Racket
To: noreply at alioth.debian.org


Feature Requests item #312552, was changed at 2010-06-07 12:06 by Isaac Gouy
You can respond by visiting:
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=411005&aid=312552&group_id=30402

>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Sam TH (samth-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Scheme PLT should be renamed to Racket
Category: Update Programming Language
Group: None
>Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
PLT Scheme has been renamed to Racket, and has released a new version,
5.0.  See http://racket-lang.org

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Isaac Gouy (igouy-guest)
Date: 2010-06-17 20:18

Message:
Check for unlikely measurements (mandelbrot #2 on u32?)

http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32/measurements.php?lang=racket

http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64/measurements.php?lang=racket


Check against mzscheme (which will be removed in a week or so)

http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=racket&lang2=mzscheme

http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=racket&lang2=mzscheme

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting:
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=411005&aid=312552&group_id=30402



-- 
sam th
samth at ccs.neu.edu