[racket-dev] P4P: A Syntax Proposal

Several things to reply to, but before I get to them, it's critical
that I fix this misconception:

>  2. I doubt that we can figure out the usefulness of this new syntax
>  on this mailing list.

I am not trying to.  I only posted it here because I figured having
lots of eyes look at it would likely yield some interesting feedback.
And that has indeed been the case.  I don't think a mailing list is
going to resolve this one way OR the other (so for the same reason, I
am also ignoring the dismissive tone of some of the postings here).

Shriram