[racket-dev] P4P: A Syntax Proposal

On Jul 30, 2010, at 6:47 AM, Robby Findler wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
>> IMO, this thing is missing the point (the usual "parens, ewww!" one),
>> as long as it ignores infix.
> 
> Seems to me that this point directly contradicts one of Shriram's
> design goals, namely showing that + is no more special than append or
> one of your own functions.

That may be true, but it doesn't counter Eli's point, which I think is entirely valid.  I had precisely the same reaction when I saw that code.

John 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4669 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20100730/6671c10c/attachment.p7s>