[racket-dev] proposal: `data' collection

At Sat, 10 Jul 2010 09:35:28 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
> Just to be sure I understand, you're saying that these two may or may
> not refer to the same file:
> 
> >>   (require foo/blah)
> >>   (require "blah.rkt")
> 
> right?

Right --- depending on whether the enclosing file is required through a
`lib' path or through a `file' path, and when "blah.rkt" is shadowed in
an alternative collects directory.

That much is true already if you shadow the "foo" collection through a
different "collects". Currently, I think the "blah.rkt" form will
always refers to a file in the same directory as the enclosing module,
but I'm not certain.