[plt-dev] PLT sickness

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Matthias Felleisen
<matthias at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>
> After quickly reading through the 'random testing' thread, I am once again
> reminded that PLT suffers from many duplications of efforts:
>
>  -- unit testing frameworks
>  -- random testing frameworks
>
> and probably more. Why?

Scheme makes it easy for everyone to "do their own thing" without too much pain.

Not blowing sunshine here...

Didn't it take MFlatt or Robby to suggest that all of the R6RS
implementers use the same test suite?

Reuse just isn't part of the culture I guess?