[plt-dev] phase for unbound identifiers

I committed a variant of this that is probably closer to your earlier
version.

There's no point specializing the message to phase -1, because no
expression is compiled in that phase. Also, as you suggested before, I
prefer leaving out "phase 0", since that makes the message simpler for
the common case.

At Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:50:39 -0700, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> One more adjustment that maps 1,0,-1 to "syntax", "runtime", "template" 
> respectively.
> 
> On 01/21/2010 10:23 AM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> > Attached is a patch to do basically this. I haven't erased references 
> > to 'transformer', though.
> >
> > On 01/20/2010 06:28 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> >> Could the error message for unbound identifiers always give the 
> >> phase? As a corollary I dislike the name 'transformer environment'.
> >>
> >> So instead of:
> >>    compile: unbound identifier in module (transformer environment) 
> >> in: take
> >> -->
> >>    compile: unbound identifier in module (phase 1) in: take
> >>
> >> And in phase 2 I don't get any special indication at all (like 
> >> 'transformer environment').
> >>
> >>    compile: unbound identifier in module in: take
> >> -->
> >>    compile: unbound identifier in module (phase 2) in: take
> >>
> >> Maybe 'phase 0' could be elided during that phase since its the most 
> >> common thing and people probably don't want to see it.
> >> _________________________________________________
> >>  For list-related administrative tasks:
> >>  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
> >
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [text/x-patch "unbound.patch"] [~/Desktop & open] [~/Temp & open]
> _________________________________________________
>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev