[plt-dev] 2htdp/image: Where oh where have my pinholes gone?
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Carl Eastlund <cce at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> Why not just have pinholes, and not use them unless you need them?
I could add one more "x-place" and "y-place" options to 2htdp/image,
namely the "pinhole" place that would be tracked like the current
pinhole.
How do you think your waldo example would work with that extension to
2htdp/image?
> Or explore other options? I mean... recursion is complex, math is
> complex, should we take them out? Why did we go straight from "it's
> complex" to "let's remove it"?
Recursion is not complex. Perhaps you should read this book on the
subject; it's a nice introduction to programming where you clean learn
more about recursion: http://www.htdp.org/
:P
Robby