[plt-dev] scheme/set

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Carl Eastlund <cce at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> wrote:
>> Again: I'm not going to stand in the way of anyone who wants to make
>> the `scheme/set' library more generalizable and extensible. But please
>> don't take away `make-set'.
>
> Now I agree.

...I almost agree.  I changed the constructors to "set", "seteq", and
"seteqv" on the trunk, so that (set 1 2 3) would look more like (list
1 2 3) and (vector 1 2 3).

--Carl