[plt-dev] `rico' and ".rkt"
On Feb 16, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
> > On Feb 16, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
> >> > (a) a racket file is in sexpr syntax only for
> >> > some specific #lang lines,
> >>
> >> Those are the only syntaxes that get the '.ss' suffix, though.
> >
> > (Um... "No"? Even a certain language that you should be familiar
> > with is in extended sexpr syntax.)
>
> Exactly - all of the files that use '.ss' are in sexpr syntax.
I suspect that #{foo : Integers} is not something that many schemers
would think of as "sexpr syntax".
> >> Scribble files, for example, have their own suffix, as do
> >> JavaScript/Datalog/ACL2/etc.
> >
> > In that case they might be broken because of this. (But at least
> > for datalog I don't think that compiling it is desired.)
>
> Broken by what? By keeping the file suffixes the same?
Broken by using their own suffix.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!