[racket-dev] [plt] Push #21701: master branch updated

Positive suggestions for improvement are welcome. Bad analogies that
don't help are like someone coming over to your house and hitting you
with hammer before you even get a chance to have some coffee.

Robby

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:01 AM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
> 5 minutes ago, Casey Klein wrote:
>>
>> For anyone following at home, the change turns this message [...]
>
> Ah, so that's what broke enough tests to make the build log explode...
>
>
>> into this one
>>
>> /Users/clklein/tmp/contract-violator.rkt:9.17: found a contradiction
>> between the contract (-> any/c any/c any/c) on #:equiv argument of
>> test--> for
>>   (file /Users/clklein/tmp/contract-violator.rkt)
>>  and its implementation; expected a procedure that accepts 2 mandatory
>> arguments without any keywords, given: 1; to fix adjust either the
>> contract or the implementation of
>>   (file /Users/clklein/tmp/contract-violator.rkt)
>
> (Not that my opinion should count for more than 5% of a vote, but this
> is IMO pretty horrible.  It makes it even more difficult to get to the
> important details, by wrapping them in text that looks like ... a
> contract.  Feels like the same annoying thing of digging through 10
> pages of a rent contract for the few places that list how you're being
> robbed.)
>
> --
>          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
>                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!
>