[plt-dev] Racket transition

If the docs refer to PLT the organization, you can leave it. If they
refer to PLT as short for PLT Scheme then changing it is the best
thing.

I think we should rename schemeunit (but keep a backwards
compatibility collection in there). Google suggests that runit is
being using for r's unit testing framework, so we could go with rkunit
or rktunit or something like that.

I propose we DONT vote on this, but the person who does the work or
porting it picks the name. :)

Robby

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Jay McCarthy <jay.mccarthy at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm working on writing my collects and documentation to use and refer
> to Racket. I had three questions:
>
> Are we renaming SchemeUnit?
> What about Schelog? (or SLaTeX)?
> Lots of docs refer to "PLT", we should change that to "Racket", correct?
>
> Jay
>
> --
> Jay McCarthy <jay at cs.byu.edu>
> Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University
> http://teammccarthy.org/jay
>
> "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
>