[plt-dev] Re: [PRL] Programming Languages in the Code of Federal Regulations

Nothing interesting to report (we've talked).

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Geoffrey S. Knauth <geoff at knauth.org> wrote:
> I wonder what the OCaml folks at Jane Street Capital have to say about all this.
>
> On Apr 27, 2010, at 03:12, Michael Sperber wrote:
>
>> John Clements <clements at brinckerhoff.org> writes:
>>
>>> Relevant background question: does anyone know how they picked Python?
>>> This information would probably tell us a lot about what it is that
>>> they're looking for.
>>
>> My own guess is that the guy who did the picking was at one point using
>> a product that had Python as an extension language.  (For bonds and
>> bond-related products, FrontArena PRIME is pretty popular, and that uses
>> Python, for instance.)
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
>