[plt-dev] Racket-tool bugs me; are we up for another poll?

From: John Clements (clements at brinckerhoff.org)
Date: Wed Apr 21 17:10:11 EDT 2010

On Apr 21, 2010, at 1:51 PM, Robby Findler wrote:

> I know this message I'm about to write is a bit dangerous, but I'm
> going to give a try because I don't have the time to really try to do
> some brainstorming on IRC (which is what I should really do here).
> Caveats out of the way, I'm not sure excited about having
> "racket-tool" as a command that is mainstay of our distribution. It
> just feels to clunky to me.
> I mentioned this in private to Matthew and he suggested that we take a
> re-vote, removing some of the options from the list, but I think that
> the ordering we have already gives me a good sense of how that would
> go.
> So, instead, let me ask that people send me a pile of pairs of names
> and we try another round of voting where the functionality of the
> names is set (according to the last round of discussions), but where
> maybe the names change.

I think it would be nice if one of the names turned out to be pleasingly easy to type.  I realize that as a dvorak user, my "easy to type" is not likely to be the same as others', but I'll try anyway:

racket krkr
racket rkrk
racket rtk
racket rkt
racket rorr


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4669 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20100421/62483dbf/attachment.p7s>

Posted on the dev mailing list.