[plt-dev] some Racket proposals & implementation

At Tue, 6 Apr 2010 12:37:34 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> wrote:
> But what's the best way to extend the static struct info API?

Instead of binding a type name (which is also the constructor name) to
a `struct-info' structure, Jay's implementation binds it to a subtype
of `struct-info' that includes keyword and optional-argument
information. I think that's the right general approach. The subtype and
accessors could be exposed to other tools, giving `match' enough
information to support patterns over constructors with keyword
arguments.