From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu) Date: Sat Apr 3 20:37:47 EDT 2010 |
|
At Sat, 3 Apr 2010 18:30:57 -0600, Robby Findler wrote: > Does it make sense to give this revision to define-struct a different > name and keep the same old define-struct around from scheme/base? Lots of other forms and procedures have `struct' in the name, so if we just change `struct' to something else, we'd either have a mismatch or have many other changes. Or did you have a different kind of change in mind?
Posted on the dev mailing list. |
|