[plt-dev] some Racket proposals & implementation

At Sat, 3 Apr 2010 06:31:58 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> > 1. match expander
> > 2. constructor
> > 3. struct type info
> >
> > Both 1 and 3 are static values so they'll conflict with each other.
> 
> The solution here is for one or both of these to be a struct property,
> rather than a struct, so that one struct can be both.

Having `struct-info'ness be a property is probably a good idea.

> Another possibility is that `match' could treat identifiers bound to
> static struct info as pattern constructors, even without them being
> match expanders.  This would probably be really easy to implement.

I think that's a good idea. (It's what I had in mind originally.)