[plt-dev] srfi 32

2009/10/19 Grant Rettke <grettke at acm.org>:

>> Why not keep it?
>>
>> There have been no other sorting SRFIs.
>
> What have people been doing for portable sort?

They use the portable reference implementation of srfi 32.

>> And compared to other SRFIs SRFI 32 is high quality.
>
> How so? Just wondering.

Well, it is unfair to point one out, but take a break
to read the reference implementation of srfi 32.
It is worth while.

-- 
Jens Axel Søgaard