[plt-dev] `unsafe-fl' and unboxing

Yes, I can add those.

At Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:27:57 -0400, Doug Williams wrote:
> Matthew,
> 
> Do you think you can sneak in unsafe-fx-abs and unsafe-fl-abs? It's a pretty
> common function - at least in the science collection - that I assume would
> compile nicely. [I promise not to ask for too many of these.]
> 
> Doug
> 
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> wrote:
> 
> > `inexact-real?'
> >
> > At Sat, 3 Oct 2009 12:47:35 -0400, Doug Williams wrote:
> > > Is there an existing contract to check for a float? For example, mean
> > would
> > > now be guaranteed to return a float instead of a real. It would be nice
> > to
> > > specify this is the contract.
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > At Sat, 3 Oct 2009 12:29:01 -0400, Doug Williams wrote:
> > > > > Are the basic unsafe-fl, unsafe-fx, and unsafe-vector-ref operations
> > > > > included in 4.2.2?
> > > >
> > > > Yes --- except for `unsafe-fx->fl', which is new in 4.2.2.3.
> > > >
> > > >
> >