[plt-dev] cons*, why not?

On Sun, 2009-07-12 at 10:43 -0400, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> We call it list*.
> 

Missed that... thanks!
However, can't understand why list* when cons* seems a better name.

> Carl Eastlund
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Paulo J. Matos<pocmatos at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I make some regular use of cons*. However, I always need to require it
> > from srfi/1. Is there any reason why it's not included in the scheme
> > language?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Paulo Matos
> >
> > _________________________________________________
> >  For list-related administrative tasks:
> >  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
> >