From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu) Date: Fri Feb 6 12:04:33 EST 2009 |
|
At Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:40:54 -0500, Dave Herman wrote: > Would it cause any problems to extend the reader syntax of prefab > literals to allow the double-dotted-infix notation? E.g.: > > > (define-struct : (name binding) #:prefab) > > #s(foo . : . 42) > #s(: foo 42) > > (equal? #s(foo . : . 42) #s(: foo 42)) > #t That seems ok to me. Any objections?
Posted on the dev mailing list. |
|