[plt-dev] `port->list'
I second this; the name is misleading.
On Dec 11, 2009, at 4:44 AM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org>
> wrote:
>> Jay recently fixed the bad order of arguments to `port->list' in the
>> implementation of `in-port'. Since then, I used this useful function
>> about 4 or 5 times.
>>
>> And in *ALL* of these cases, I wrote the code, ran it, saw an error,
>> and swapped the arguments.
>>
>> (port->list read) just doesn't make any sense at all to me.
>>
>> This was a *very* bad choice of order for the arguments.
>
> Perhaps the problem here is the name? If it had been (read-all
> [reader port]), perhaps the one-argument case of (read-all read) would
> have made more sense.
>
> --Carl
> _________________________________________________
> For list-related administrative tasks:
> http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev