Neil, I don't think that this is the right call, if I understand you correctly. So, to double check that I understand correctly, are you planning to provide a compatibility layer for plot with some other name? If so, did you consider leaving that as the plot library for a few releases to give people time to migrate what they care about? Robby On Friday, September 30, 2011, Neil Toronto <<a href="mailto:neil.toronto@gmail.com">neil.toronto@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > These two replies seem to sum up the user population that has actually used the old 'plot'... except for Robby. :D The impression I'm getting is that the old plot library does little enough that users have been unwilling or unable to use it for important things. (Generally, of course. And except for Robby. :D) > > I'm going to call the new one 'plot' and break compatibility. I'm maintaining it, so I'll take responsibility for broken user code and helping people migrate. > > Thanks for your input, everybody. > > Neil T > > On 09/30/2011 01:15 PM, Eduardo Bellani wrote: >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Same here. >> >>> I've used it. Nothing I can't live without. I'm happy for it to >>> break in the name of progress. >>> >> >> >> - -- >> Eduardo Bellani >> >> omnia mutantur, nihil interit. >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) >> >> iEYEARECAAYFAk6GFW0ACgkQSbLl0kCTjGlbTwCffucNBM9Hb6gLH/QKtzTCdCHv >> AU8An1ySLEIPnxOKXbeOtXSMSViXLOQQ >> =6vK3 >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > <a href="http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users">http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users</a> >