I don't think that's currently possible. Patches welcome, of course, or if you have a concrete missing thing (I'm inferring that everything is ok at the moment from the below but I'm not positive about that) I can add something. <br>
<br>Robby<br><br>On Tuesday, August 2, 2011, Jon Rafkind <<a href="mailto:rafkind@cs.utah.edu">rafkind@cs.utah.edu</a>> wrote:<br>> Ok the last mystery is how can I control the pair matching and colors that lexemes should have? If I call `start-colorer' on the color:text% I can pass in the style function and the list of matching lexemes but with the module-reader I only have control over the lexer via #:info.<br>
><br>> Currently I have<br>><br>> (define (style what)<br>> (case what<br>> [(number) "framework:syntax-color:scheme:constant"]<br>> [(string) "framework:syntax-color:scheme:string"]<br>
> [(identifier) "framework:syntax-color:scheme:symbol"]<br>> [(parens) "framework:syntax-color:scheme:parenthesis"]<br>> [else "Standard"]))<br>><br>> (define pairs '([ |(| |)| ]<br>
> [ |[| |]| ]<br>> [ |{| |}| ]<br>> ))<br>><br>> And although my current `pairs' list matches what the text-mode-mixin has I may add things to the list in the future.<br>
><br>> On 08/02/2011 10:56 AM, Robby Findler wrote:<br>><br>> No. It should back up to the previous lexeme and start there.<br>><br>> Robby<br>><br>> On Tuesday, August 2, 2011, Jon Rafkind <<a href="mailto:rafkind@cs.utah.edu">rafkind@cs.utah.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
>> On 08/01/2011 06:40 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:<br>>>> At Mon, 01 Aug 2011 18:13:11 -0600, Jon Rafkind wrote:<br>>>>> How do I deal with partial lexemes when using the color:text colorer? It<br>
>>>> seems that if my lexer cannot produce a valid token then it will throw<br>>>>> an error and the color thread will keep calling `get-token' in a busy loop.<br>>>>><br>>>>> Is there some magic thing I can return from `get-token' to tell the<br>
>>>> colorer that it should not progress to the next position?<br>>>> A coloring lexer's job is to never fail. It should instead categorize<br>>>> bad input as 'error and be ready to continue.<br>
>>><br>>>> Continuing can mean categorizing all further input as 'error, but it's<br>>>> usually better to continue in some other way.<br>>>><br>>><br>>> It seems the colorer re-tokenizes the entire input stream each time I<br>
>> enter a character. Is that the expected behavior?<br>>> _________________________________________________<br>>> For list-related administrative tasks:<br>>> <a href="http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users">http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users</a><br>
>><br>>