<p>I think the big difference, as someone who currently uses Check Syntax a lot, is that Peter is asking for refactoring that reaches to other files. Perhaps the right way to integrate this is via the module browser.</p>
<p>On Jul 16, 2011 10:06 AM, "Robby Findler" <<a href="mailto:robby@eecs.northwestern.edu">robby@eecs.northwestern.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> I realize that Check Syntax requires some setup time, but speaking<br>
> purely in terms of functionality, is that getting at what you want?<br>
><br>
> Robby<br>
><br>
> 2011/7/16 Ivanyi Peter <<a href="mailto:pivanyi@freemail.hu">pivanyi@freemail.hu</a>>:<br>
> > Markku Rontu <<a href="mailto:markku.rontu@iki.fi">markku.rontu@iki.fi</a>>, ezt írta:<br>
> >> A wish list, well I'd like "extract function" refactoring and more advanced<br>
> >> renaming than search & replace. Also would be nice to be able to have<br>
> >> visibility to all defined modules, requires, provides, functions, classes,<br>
> >> structs etc. in a whole project and quick navigation within it.<br>
> ><br>
> > I also would like to vote for these.<br>
> > - E.g. Replacing a function name with any other name at<br>
> > every place where it can be "meaningfully" determined that<br>
> > it is the same function name.<br>
> > - Project view. Yes, please.<br>
> ><br>
> > Best regards,<br>
> ><br>
> > Peter Ivanyi<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > _________________________________________________<br>
> > For list-related administrative tasks:<br>
> > <a href="http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users">http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users</a><br>
> ><br>
><br>
> _________________________________________________<br>
> For list-related administrative tasks:<br>
> <a href="http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users">http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users</a></p>