That's pretty much how it works. Although, we tend to be isolated groups who don't do as much of the posting of drafts as we should.<br><br>Noel, is there a Scheme numerics mailing list associated with Schematics?<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Jason Lillywhite <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jason.lillywhite@gmail.com">jason.lillywhite@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I'm confused about how libraries are publicized. Do you first post<br>
drafts in Github/Schematics, then as it matures, you put it in PlaneT?<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Noel Welsh<<a href="mailto:noelwelsh@gmail.com">noelwelsh@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> No, I'm still keeping stuff on Schematics. The stuff on Github is code<br>
> I think others might find interesting but I don't expect to develop to<br>
> the state where I'd release on Planet. Git is a much better system<br>
> than Subversion for this kind of thing.<br>
><br>
> Were I starting a project today I think Github would be a more<br>
> compelling platform than Sourceforge. It's much lighter weight.<br>
> However SF is fine for what we use it for, and there is no reason to<br>
> leave.<br>
><br>
> I've enabled the Git and Mercurial options at SF if anyone wants to use them.<br>
><br>
> N.<br>
><br>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Doug<br>
> Williams<<a href="mailto:m.douglas.williams@gmail.com">m.douglas.williams@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> Noel, are you using github exclusively now? Should I move there from<br>
>> Schematics?<br>
>><br>
>> Doug<br>
><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>