The problem does seem to be in PLoT. When I run demo-1.ss (in C:\Program Files\PLT-FULL-18.104.22.168\collects\plot\demos on my machine), it generally has an empty plot. Occasionally it will show the plot - maybe 1 time in 10 or so, the other times it is just the axes and labels. [Don't be confused by the image in the source file, which also prints out when evaluated. I just comment it out or delete it. Then just hit the run button repeatedly. Also, it has to be run in the Pretty Big language because of build-list.]
<br><br>I also checked it with some of the science collections tests (for example, uniform-int-histogram-int-example.ss in the example subdirectory of the science collection, which doesn't have the subcollection reference problem). It exhibits the same behavior.
<br><br>For the PLaneT subcollection problem, the exact error message I get is: bernoulli-example.ss:1:9: planet: bad module path in: (planet "bernoulli.ss" ("williams" "science.plt") "random-distributions"). But, (require (planet "
science.ss" ("williams" "science.plt"))) works fine.<br><br>But there is a noticeable speedup in the overall test execution.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 3, 2008 3:25 PM, Doug Williams <
<a href="mailto:email@example.com">firstname.lastname@example.org</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I tried running the science collection examples in 3.99. Most of the plots were just empty, so I need to see if it's a problem with the PLoT package or with my code. [They didn't error, just gave empty plots.] For the ones that did run and which are computationally intensive (with flonums) - like Chebyshev evaluation and (especially) the ordinary differential equation solvers - they 'seemed' much faster. But, it's anecdotal - I just eyeballed it. I have to track down my uses of set-cdr!, etc in the simulation collection before I try any of my larger examples there.
<br><br>One interesting problem came up. Has the use of subcollections in PLaneT changed with 3.99? For example, (require (planet "bernoulli.ss" ("williams" "science.plt") "random-distributions")) says it can't find the file, but it works fine in V372 (and before).
<br><font color="#888888"><br>Doug</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 28, 2007 3:55 PM, Noel Welsh <<a href="mailto:email@example.com" target="_blank">firstname.lastname@example.org
</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Joyous day! Should my code run in 3.99 I'll do some benchmarking.<br><font color="#888888"><br>N.<br></font><div><div></div><div><br>On Dec 28, 2007 10:52 PM, Matthew Flatt <<a href="mailto:email@example.com" target="_blank">
firstname.lastname@example.org</a>> wrote:<br>> The latest in SVN (v22.214.171.124) includes new JIT support on x86 for<br>> inlining flonum (i.e., inexact real) arithmetic. I expect to fill in<br>> x86_64 and PPC support next week.
<br>><br>> This change makes inexact-heavy microbenchmarks run 2-3 times as fast.<br>> It might be useful for real programs, too, but I don't seem to have any<br>> interesting floating-point applications to try out.
<br>><br>> Matthew<br>_________________________________________________<br> For list-related administrative tasks:<br> <a href="http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme" target="_blank">http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme