Thanks to all whom replied so far. It seems that SchemeDoc should be usable with module files too (at least nothing I read seem to prohibit it), and the generated document looks pretty good, but doesn't seem compatible with with doc.txt. Scribble, on the other hand, still lives in the pre branch, so not sure if it's ready for prime time yet... I will try both and see which one works better for my needs. So no one pick up on the docstring question yet - does that mean no one likes docstring? ;) Thanks, yinso <div>On 6/8/07, Noel Welsh <<a href="mailto:noelwelsh@gmail.com">noelwelsh@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> I think the future belongs to Scribble, which I understand is being used to document future versions of PLT Scheme.  I have yet to use it, but Dave tells me it is easy to use. I'm about a gnats whisker away from make a macro ala: (define/doc name documentation value) [Actually it will probably all definition of contract as well, have a shorter name, and support more forms, but you get the idea] N. On 6/8/07, Grant Rettke < <a href="mailto:grettke@acm.org">grettke@acm.org</a>> wrote: > Schemedoc works for code that does not live in modules and runs on v370: > > <a href="http://www.cs.aau.dk/~normark/schemedoc/">http://www.cs.aau.dk/~normark/schemedoc/ </a> _________________________________________________   For list-related administrative tasks:   <a href="http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme">http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme </a> </blockquote></div>