[racket] Submodule tests vs separate-file tests

Neat, thanks.

> On Mar 17, 2015, at 04:58, Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> wrote:
> 
> Using a submodule does increase the ".zo" file size, but the submodule
> portion of the ".zo" file is not loaded when the main module is loaded,
> so it's as good as a separate bytecode file.
> 
> At Tue, 17 Mar 2015 01:38:25 -0700, Alexis King wrote:
>> Is there any preferred convention for location of tests in libraries? Using a 
>> test submodule is convenient, but does keeping all the tests in separate files 
>> reduce loading costs? Does using submodules bloat the .zo size, or are they 
>> compiled separately a la Java inner classes?
>> 
>> Alexis____________________
>>  Racket Users list:
>>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/users