[racket] coding with continuations

On Oct 27, 2014, at 9:08 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:

> They are what makes Scheme different from other languages.  They're the 
> reason that I am picking Scheme (likely typed Scheme initially) instead 
> of OCaml for ths project.
> 
> So please don't get rid of them


It doesn't. OCaml has continuations and call/cc, spelled differently. 

;; --- 

Racket and OCaml differ in many other ways. See syntax system, modules, 
classes, genericity, dynamic types, static types, etc. But yes, we're
brothers in arms. Or something like that. 

-- Matthias