[racket] Advice on using math/array and math/matrix to rewrite MATLAB code

From: Alexander D. Knauth (alexander at knauth.org)
Date: Sat May 3 16:10:09 EDT 2014

This type-checks:
#lang typed/racket

(: log2 (Nonnegative-Real -> Real))
(define (log2 x)
  (/ (log x) (log 2)))
Why don’t you just use this?  

On May 3, 2014, at 10:09 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard <jensaxel at soegaard.net> wrote:

> 2014-05-03 8:43 GMT+02:00 Daniel Prager <daniel.a.prager at gmail.com>:
>> I'm having a go at converting a pitch detection algorithm from MATLAB to
>> Typed Racket, and which I'll Open Source if I can get it working, and am
>> after a few pointers, since I'm new to TR and am finding it slow going.
>> 
>> Examples of the kind of code I'm writing in my fledlging attempts:
>> 
>> #lang typed/racket
>> 
>> (define: (log2 [x : Real]) : Real
>>  (define result (/ (log x) (log 2)))
>>  (if (real? result)
>>      result
>>      0.0))
> 
> My strategy is write the write the function in normal Racket first:
> 
>  (define (log2 x)
>      (/ (log x) (log 2)))
> 
> Then to add the type:
> 
>  (: log2 : Real -> Real)
>  (define (log2 x)
>      (/ (log x) (log 2)))
> 
> In this case I get a type error, the result is not a Real but a Number.
> If x is negative, then (log x) is a complex number. I therefore need
> to insert a an explicit check that x is positive:
> 
> (: log2 : Real -> Real)
> (define (log2 x)
>    (cond [(positive? x) (/ (log x) (log 2))]
>              [else             (error 'log2 "positive number expected")]))
> 
> This version type checks.
> 
>> (define: (build-step-vector [min : Real] [step : Real] [max : Real]) :
>>  (Vectorof Real)
>>  (for/vector: : (Vectorof Real)
>>      #:length (ceiling (inexact->exact (/ (- max min) step)))
>>      ([i (in-naturals)])
>>    (+ min (* i step))))
> 
> Here I tried this version:
> 
> (: step-vector : Real Real Real -> (Vectorof Real))
> (define (step-vector min max step)
>  (for/vector #:length (exact-ceiling (/ (- max min) step))
>    ([x (in-range min max step)])
>    x))
> 
> This gave an error, since TR could only infer that the result was a
> (Vectorof Any).
> Then I changed it to:
> 
> (: step-vector : Real Real Real -> (Vectorof Real))
> (define (step-vector min max step)
>  (for/vector: : (Vectorof Real) #:length (exact-ceiling (/ (- max min) step))
>    ([x (in-range min max step)])
>    x))
> 
>> Beyond that:
>> 
>> Can anyone point me to examples of any code before/after converted from
>> MATLAB (or Octave) to TR?
> 
> I haven't any experience with either (except reading parts of the
> documentation).
> Do you have any particular examples in mind?
> 
>> What's a good scalar type to work with for floating point to start with?
> 
> Flonum ?
> 
>> Which non-scalar type(s) should I favor: vectors, arrays or matrices?
> 
> Matrices are just two-dimensional arrays. Therefore if there is a matrix
> operation missing, mostly likely you can find it in the array section
> of the documentation.
> 
> If you stick with matrices, you can view vectors as nx1 matrices.
> This allows you to use the matrix operations on vectors.
> 
> Depending on the operations you need, I'd try out matrices.
> 
>> Any general tips to develop facility for this kind of stuff? I feel like I
>> need to go "back to basics", but there seems to be a dearth of examples and
>> tutorials. on math/... beyond the reference materials.
> 
> True.
> 
> /Jens Axel
> ____________________
>  Racket Users list:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20140503/29e2a3ea/attachment.html>

Posted on the users mailing list.